rename boris-25-mar-26 asset folder to boris-26-3-25

Adopt YY-M-D naming scheme (year-month-date, month as numeric) for chronological sortability. Update image references in the squash-merging / PR-size post. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-17 06:28:51 +05:00
parent e9851f926b
commit 1979e196c9
3 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Boris shared his GitHub contribution graph showing **266 contributions on March
 - Each PR = one commit makes it easy to revert entire features and simplifies `git bisect`
 - At high-velocity AI-assisted workflows (141 PRs/day), squash is the pragmatic choice — individual "fix lint", "try this" commits within a branch are noise

-<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-25-mar-26/1.png" alt="Boris Cherny — 266 contributions, always squashed" width="50%" /></a>
+<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-26-3-25/1.png" alt="Boris Cherny — 266 contributions, always squashed" width="50%" /></a>

 ---

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Boris shared the size distribution across those 141 PRs, totaling **45,032 lines
 - The distribution is heavily right-skewed — the occasional large PR is inevitable (bulk renames, migrations), but the norm is tight
 - Small PRs reduce merge conflict risk, are easier to review, and pair perfectly with squash merging for clean reverts

-<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-25-mar-26/2.png" alt="Boris Cherny — PR size distribution table" width="50%" /></a>
+<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-26-3-25/2.png" alt="Boris Cherny — PR size distribution table" width="50%" /></a>

 ---