diff --git a/tips/assets/boris-25-mar-26/1.png b/tips/assets/boris-26-3-25/1.png
similarity index 100%
rename from tips/assets/boris-25-mar-26/1.png
rename to tips/assets/boris-26-3-25/1.png
diff --git a/tips/assets/boris-25-mar-26/2.png b/tips/assets/boris-26-3-25/2.png
similarity index 100%
rename from tips/assets/boris-25-mar-26/2.png
rename to tips/assets/boris-26-3-25/2.png
diff --git a/tips/claude-boris-2-tips-25-mar-26.md b/tips/claude-boris-2-tips-25-mar-26.md
index 44dee32..a46a554 100644
--- a/tips/claude-boris-2-tips-25-mar-26.md
+++ b/tips/claude-boris-2-tips-25-mar-26.md
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Boris shared his GitHub contribution graph showing **266 contributions on March
 - Each PR = one commit makes it easy to revert entire features and simplifies `git bisect`
 - At high-velocity AI-assisted workflows (141 PRs/day), squash is the pragmatic choice — individual "fix lint", "try this" commits within a branch are noise
 
-<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-25-mar-26/1.png" alt="Boris Cherny — 266 contributions, always squashed" width="50%" /></a>
+<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-26-3-25/1.png" alt="Boris Cherny — 266 contributions, always squashed" width="50%" /></a>
 
 ---
 
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Boris shared the size distribution across those 141 PRs, totaling **45,032 lines
 - The distribution is heavily right-skewed — the occasional large PR is inevitable (bulk renames, migrations), but the norm is tight
 - Small PRs reduce merge conflict risk, are easier to review, and pair perfectly with squash merging for clean reverts
 
-<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-25-mar-26/2.png" alt="Boris Cherny — PR size distribution table" width="50%" /></a>
+<a href="https://x.com/bcherny/status/2038552880018538749"><img src="assets/boris-26-3-25/2.png" alt="Boris Cherny — PR size distribution table" width="50%" /></a>
 
 ---