Files
claude-code-best-practice/.claude/commands/workflows/development-workflows.md
T
Shayan Rais 2f21c03d87 update /workflows:development-workflows to populate new Workflow column and research 11 repos
Bumps repo count from 10 to 11 (adds mattpocock/skills to Agent 1's
batch), replaces "Uniqueness tags" research item with "Workflow"
canonical pipeline, and documents the shields.io badge encoding rules
(/ → %2F, - → --, _ → __, dots/colons verbatim) so the orchestrator
encodes plain-text agent output into ddf4ff badges consistently. Adds
mandatory Rule 11 forbidding synthesized pipelines — agents must trace
each repo's documented happy path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-29 00:13:38 +05:00

12 KiB

description
description
Update the DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOWS table by researching all 11 workflow repos in parallel

Workflow — Development Workflows

Update the DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOWS table in README.md by researching 11 repos in parallel. Launch agents, merge results, present changes, update table if approved.


The 11 Repos

# Repo Owner
1 github/spec-kit GitHub (John Lam / Den Delimarsky)
2 Fission-AI/OpenSpec Fission-AI (@0xTab)
3 humanlayer/humanlayer HumanLayer (Dex Horthy)
4 affaan-m/everything-claude-code Affaan Mustafa
5 gsd-build/get-shit-done Lex Christopherson
6 obra/superpowers Jesse Vincent
7 garrytan/gstack Garry Tan (YC CEO)
8 bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD BMAD Code Org
9 EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin Every.to
10 Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode Yeachan Heo (@bellman_ych)
11 mattpocock/skills Matt Pocock

Table Format

The README table has these columns:

| Name | ★ | Plan | <img src="!/tags/a.svg" height="14"> | <img src="!/tags/c.svg" height="14"> | <img src="!/tags/s.svg" height="14"> | Workflow |
  • Name: [Short Name](github-url) — use project name, not owner/repo
  • : Star count rounded to k (e.g., 98k, 10k, 4.1k). Under 1000 show exact number
  • Plan: Icon + linked name of the Plan implementation. Icon is <img src="!/tags/c.svg" height="14"> for command, <img src="!/tags/a.svg" height="14"> for agent, <img src="!/tags/s.svg" height="14"> for skill. Name links to the actual file in the repo
  • Agent/Command/Skill counts: Just the number (e.g., 25, 0, 108+)
  • Workflow: The canonical end-to-end pipeline as a sequence of shields.io badges joined by . Each step is the actual command/skill/agent name from the repo (e.g. /speckit.plan, bmad-create-prd, subagent-driven-development). Use parenthetical sub-steps only when a stage has a critical inner loop (e.g. (/tdd + feedback loops)). Trace the README's "how to use" / "workflow" section for the canonical happy path: idea → spec/plan → tasks → implement → review → ship.

Workflow badge encoding (shields.io)

Each step renders as ![label](https://img.shields.io/badge/<ENCODED>-ddf4ff). Encoding rules:

Input character Encoded as
/ (leading slash) %2F
- (literal dash) --
_ (literal underscore) __
(space) _
+ %2B
. and : unchanged

Examples:

  • /grill-me%2Fgrill--me
  • /speckit.plan%2Fspeckit.plan
  • /opsx:propose%2Fopsx:propose
  • bmad-create-epics-and-storiesbmad--create--epics--and--stories

Join steps with the literal arrow character (space-arrow-space) outside the badge markdown. For sub-loops, wrap in parentheses inside the cell, e.g. ![/team](...) (![team-plan](...) → ![team-fix](...) loop) → ![/ralph](...).

Sort order: Sorted by stars descending (highest first). Do NOT group by Plan type.


Phase 0: Read Current State

Read these files:

  1. README.md — the ## ⚙️ DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOWS table (note current stars, tags, Plan links, counts)
  2. changelog/development-workflows/changelog.md — previous changelog entries

Phase 1: Launch 2 Research Agents

Immediately spawn both agents in a single message (parallel). Each uses subagent_type: "development-workflows-research-agent".

Agent 1 (4 repos)

Research these 4 Claude Code workflow repositories:

Repo 1: github/spec-kit (https://github.com/github/spec-kit) Repo 2: affaan-m/everything-claude-code (https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code) Repo 3: obra/superpowers (https://github.com/obra/superpowers) Repo 4: mattpocock/skills (https://github.com/mattpocock/skills)

For EACH repo, return:

  1. Stars — use GitHub API https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}, read stargazers_count. Round to k.
  2. Agent count — count .md files in agents/ or .claude/agents/. For obra, also count implicit sub-agents dispatched by skills. For mattpocock, count is 0 (skills-only repo).
  3. Skill count — count folders in skills/ or .claude/skills/. For mattpocock, count folders in skills/ at repo root.
  4. Command count — count .md files in commands/ or .claude/commands/. For spec-kit, count files in templates/commands/. For mattpocock, count is 0 (skills serve as slash commands).
  5. Plan implementation — find the Plan/planning agent, skill, or command. Return its name, type (agent/skill/command), and file path. For mattpocock, the Plan-artifact-producing skill is to-prd (the alignment skill grill-me is the upstream entry point but not the Plan column).
  6. Workflow — the canonical end-to-end pipeline as a sequence of step names joined by . Trace the README's "how to use" / "workflow" section for the happy path: idea → spec/plan → tasks → implement → review → ship. Use the actual command/skill/agent names from the repo. Wrap critical inner loops in parentheses, e.g. subagent-driven-development (test-driven-development + requesting-code-review). Output as plain text — the orchestrator will encode each step into a shields.io badge.
  7. Notable changes — any significant recent changes? New agents/skills/commands, major versions?

Return structured report per repo:

REPO: github/spec-kit
STARS: <number>k
AGENTS: <count>
COMMANDS: <count>
SKILLS: <count>
PLAN: <name> (<type>) — <file-path>
WORKFLOW: <step1> → <step2> → ... → <stepN>
CHANGES: <changes or "No significant changes">

Agent 2 (7 repos)

Research these 7 Claude Code workflow repositories:

Repo 1: Fission-AI/OpenSpec (https://github.com/Fission-AI/OpenSpec) Repo 2: humanlayer/humanlayer (https://github.com/humanlayer/humanlayer) Repo 3: gsd-build/get-shit-done (https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done) Repo 4: garrytan/gstack (https://github.com/garrytan/gstack) Repo 5: bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD (https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD) Repo 6: EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin (https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin) Repo 7: Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode (https://github.com/Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode)

For EACH repo, return:

  1. Stars — use GitHub API https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}, read stargazers_count. Round to k.
  2. Agent count — count .md files in agents/ or .claude/agents/. For BMAD, count agent-persona skills in src/bmm-skills/. For compound-engineering-plugin, count .md files across all subdirectories of plugins/compound-engineering/agents/. For oh-my-claudecode, count .md files in agents/ at repo root.
  3. Skill count — count folders in skills/ or .claude/skills/. For gstack, skills are root-level directories with SKILL.md. For BMAD, count all skills in src/bmm-skills/ and src/core-skills/. For compound-engineering-plugin, count folders in plugins/compound-engineering/skills/ plus plugins/coding-tutor/skills/. For oh-my-claudecode, count folders in skills/ at repo root.
  4. Command count — count .md files in commands/ or .claude/commands/. For GSD, count in commands/gsd/. For OpenSpec, count /opsx:* commands. For BMAD, count is 0 (commands generated at install time). For compound-engineering-plugin, count .md files in .claude/commands/ plus plugins/coding-tutor/commands/. For oh-my-claudecode, count is 0 (skills serve as slash commands).
  5. Plan implementation — find the Plan/planning agent, skill, or command. Return its name, type (agent/skill/command), and file path.
  6. Workflow — the canonical end-to-end pipeline as a sequence of step names joined by . Trace the README's "how to use" / "workflow" section for the happy path: idea → spec/plan → tasks → implement → review → ship. Use the actual command/skill/agent names from the repo. Wrap critical inner loops in parentheses, e.g. /team (team-plan → team-fix loop) → /ralph. Output as plain text — the orchestrator will encode each step into a shields.io badge.
  7. Notable changes — any significant recent changes? New agents/skills/commands, major versions?

Return structured report per repo:

REPO: Fission-AI/OpenSpec
STARS: <number>k
AGENTS: <count>
COMMANDS: <count>
SKILLS: <count>
PLAN: <name> (<type>) — <file-path>
WORKFLOW: <step1> → <step2> → ... → <stepN>
CHANGES: <changes or "No significant changes">

Phase 2: Compare & Report

Wait for both agents. Then compare findings against the current table and present:

Development Workflows — Update Report
══════════════════════════════════════

Changes Found:
  <repo>: ★ <old>k → <new>k | agents <old>→<new> | commands <old>→<new> | skills <old>→<new>
  <repo>: workflow updated: <old workflow> → <new workflow>
  <repo>: Plan link changed: <old> → <new>
  ...

No Changes:
  <repo>: ✓ (all values match)
  ...

Action Items:
#  | Type        | Action                                | Status
1  | Star        | Update <repo> ★ from Xk to Yk         | NEW/RECURRING
2  | Count       | Update <repo> agents from X to Y      | NEW/RECURRING
3  | Workflow    | Update <repo> workflow pipeline       | NEW/RECURRING
4  | Plan        | Update <repo> Plan link               | NEW/RECURRING
5  | Sort        | Move <repo> (Plan type changed)       | NEW/RECURRING

Compare with previous changelog entries and mark items as NEW, RECURRING, or RESOLVED.


Phase 2.5: Append to Changelog

MANDATORY — always execute before presenting to user.

Read changelog/development-workflows/changelog.md, then append a new entry. If the file doesn't exist, create it with a Status Legend then the first entry.

---

## [<YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM AM/PM PKT>] Development Workflows Update

| # | Priority | Type | Action | Status |
|---|----------|------|--------|--------|
| 1 | HIGH/MED/LOW | <type> | <action> | <status> |

Get time via TZ=Asia/Karachi date "+%Y-%m-%d %I:%M %p PKT". Status must be one of:

  • COMPLETE (reason) | INVALID (reason) | ON HOLD (reason)

Always append, never overwrite.


Phase 2.6: Update Last Updated Badge

MANDATORY — execute after Phase 2.5.

Update the badge on line 4 of README.md. Get time via TZ=Asia/Karachi date "+%b %d, %Y %-I:%M %p PKT", URL-encode it, replace the date in the badge. Do NOT log this as an action item.


Phase 3: Execute

Ask user: (1) Execute all | (2) Execute specific | (3) Skip

When executing, edit the ## ⚙️ DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOWS table in README.md:

  • Update stars, Plan links, counts, and the Workflow column per row
  • Maintain sort order: stars descending (highest first). Do NOT group by Plan type
  • Match existing format exactly (icons, badge URLs, link style)
  • For the Workflow column, encode each plain-text step the agent returned into a ddf4ff shields.io badge per the encoding rules in the Table Format section, then join with

Rules

  1. Launch BOTH agents in parallel — single message, never sequential
  2. Never guess — use data from agents only
  3. Don't auto-execute — present report first, wait for approval
  4. ALWAYS append changelog and ALWAYS update badge — mandatory
  5. Sort by stars descending — highest stars first, do NOT group by Plan type
  6. Workflow badges use shields.io![step](https://img.shields.io/badge/<ENCODED>-ddf4ff) with _ for spaces, -- for hyphens, __ for underscores, %2F for /, %2B for +. Dots and colons survive verbatim. Join steps with . Always update the Workflow column when any step name in the upstream repo changes.
  7. Plan links must point to actual files — not repo root
  8. Agents, commands, skills are different — count from their respective directories, don't conflate
  9. Round stars consistentlyk suffix (98k, 10k, 4.1k). Under 1000 show exact
  10. Compare with previous changelog — mark items NEW, RECURRING, or RESOLVED
  11. Workflow column is mandatory — every row must have a Workflow cell. Trace the README's "how to use" / canonical happy path; do not synthesize a fictional pipeline. Wrap critical inner loops in parentheses (e.g. (/tdd + feedback loops)).